McCAIN KEEPS HUDSON AS CATHOLIC ADVISOR DESPITE INCIDENT WITH UNDERAGE GIRL.
Some campaign allies urge him to cut ties with scandal plagued conservative Catholic activist.
For weeks, Sen. John McCain's campaign has quietly resisted calls to dump one of his leading religious representatives who critics say is an inappropriate surrogate because of sexual impropriety.
At least three Catholic religious groups and hundreds of individual Catholics have asked the McCain campaign to remove Deal W. Hudson from its national Catholic-outreach group. The groups say Hudson, who quit President Bush's political team in 2004 amid similar calls, lacks the moral authority to represent the campaign on religious issues.
Hudson left a tenured professorship at Fordham University in New York after a 1994 incident in which he was accused of taking an underage student drinking and then having sex with her. He was never charged with a crime.
According to the Arizona Republic, the controversy could hamper McCain's efforts to win over Catholic voters, who are wary of his candidacy.
Tucker Bounds, an official McCain spokesman belittled Hudson's role in the campaign, saying about Hudson "He's a name on a list, a volunteer."
But those who are troubled by Hudson's background say he is more than a volunteer. Earlier this month, he was identified on a Catholic radio show as a McCain surrogate, and he also hosted a conference call with the deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee discussing the campaign with Catholic media.
"He just shouldn't be representing Catholics for the campaign. It's offensive," said a member of McCain's steering committee who did not want his name used. Catholics "reject him as a moral arbiter."
For McCain, it is the second time his supporters have upset at least some Catholics, a key voting group. In May, McCain rejected the support of the Rev. John Hagee, a Texas-based tel- evangelist who has made several anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish comments.
Hudson, a self-styled "theocon" who now lives in Fairfax, Va., left Fordham after one of his former students sued him, claiming he plied her with drinks and had sex with her. The case was later settled.
Hudson, who was a philosophy professor, declined to comment through a spokesman. In an earlier statement, Hudson said: "My past continues to be a source of shame to me and, unfortunately, my family. I'm not blaming anyone for this. In 2000, Hudson served as a leading figure for Bush's efforts in courting Catholic voters. In August 2004, he quit Bush's re-election campaign after the National Catholic Reporter outlined the Fordham incident.
In March, Hudson found a home with the McCain campaign, when he was among a group of about 100 "prominent Catholics" supporting McCain.
McCain is in desperate need of Catholic votes. He is not in accord with church positions on the war in Iraq, health care, assistance to the poor, stem cell research, the death penalty or the right of workers to form unions. While he is viewed as better than his opponent on the matter of abortion rights, he does not recognize the fetus as a person and does not support a federal law against abortion. He has supported pro-abortion appointees to the courts.
Some campaign allies urge him to cut ties with scandal plagued conservative Catholic activist.
For weeks, Sen. John McCain's campaign has quietly resisted calls to dump one of his leading religious representatives who critics say is an inappropriate surrogate because of sexual impropriety.
At least three Catholic religious groups and hundreds of individual Catholics have asked the McCain campaign to remove Deal W. Hudson from its national Catholic-outreach group. The groups say Hudson, who quit President Bush's political team in 2004 amid similar calls, lacks the moral authority to represent the campaign on religious issues.
Hudson left a tenured professorship at Fordham University in New York after a 1994 incident in which he was accused of taking an underage student drinking and then having sex with her. He was never charged with a crime.
According to the Arizona Republic, the controversy could hamper McCain's efforts to win over Catholic voters, who are wary of his candidacy.
Tucker Bounds, an official McCain spokesman belittled Hudson's role in the campaign, saying about Hudson "He's a name on a list, a volunteer."
But those who are troubled by Hudson's background say he is more than a volunteer. Earlier this month, he was identified on a Catholic radio show as a McCain surrogate, and he also hosted a conference call with the deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee discussing the campaign with Catholic media.
"He just shouldn't be representing Catholics for the campaign. It's offensive," said a member of McCain's steering committee who did not want his name used. Catholics "reject him as a moral arbiter."
For McCain, it is the second time his supporters have upset at least some Catholics, a key voting group. In May, McCain rejected the support of the Rev. John Hagee, a Texas-based tel- evangelist who has made several anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish comments.
Hudson, a self-styled "theocon" who now lives in Fairfax, Va., left Fordham after one of his former students sued him, claiming he plied her with drinks and had sex with her. The case was later settled.
Hudson, who was a philosophy professor, declined to comment through a spokesman. In an earlier statement, Hudson said: "My past continues to be a source of shame to me and, unfortunately, my family. I'm not blaming anyone for this. In 2000, Hudson served as a leading figure for Bush's efforts in courting Catholic voters. In August 2004, he quit Bush's re-election campaign after the National Catholic Reporter outlined the Fordham incident.
In March, Hudson found a home with the McCain campaign, when he was among a group of about 100 "prominent Catholics" supporting McCain.
McCain is in desperate need of Catholic votes. He is not in accord with church positions on the war in Iraq, health care, assistance to the poor, stem cell research, the death penalty or the right of workers to form unions. While he is viewed as better than his opponent on the matter of abortion rights, he does not recognize the fetus as a person and does not support a federal law against abortion. He has supported pro-abortion appointees to the courts.